Discourse Actions to Promote Student Access

We discuss how discourse actions can provide students greater access to high quality mathematics. We define discourse actions as what teachers or students say or do to elicit student contributions about a mathematical idea and generate ongoing discussion around student contributions. We provide rubrics and checklists for readers to use.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 143 KB)
    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 133 KB)
    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 165 KB)

Footnotes

Teachers at all grade levels can use these examples to support accessibility to high-quality mathematics.

Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12
  • BanseHolland W.Natalia A. PalaciosEileen G. Merritt and Sara E. Rimm-Kaufman. 2016. “5 Strategies for Scaffolding Math Discourse with ELLs.Teaching Children Mathematics 23no. 2 (September): 100108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BerryRobert Q. and Mark W. Ellis. 2013. “Multidimensional Teaching.Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 19no. 3 (October): 17278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoalerJo and James G. Greeno. 2000. “Identity, Agency, and Knowing in Mathematics Worlds.” In Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning edited by Jo Boaler pp. 171200. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoalerJo and Megan Staples. 2008. “Creating Mathematical Futures through an Equitable Teaching Approach: The Case of Railside School.Teachers College Record 110no. 3 (March): 60845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BostonMelissa D. 2012. “Assessing the Quality of Mathematics Instruction.Elementary School Journal 113 (1): 76104.

  • BostonMelissa D.Amber G. Candela and Juli K. Dixon. 2019. Making Sense of Mathematics for Teaching to Inform Instructional Quality. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CaiJinfaJohn C. MoyerNing WangStephen HwangBikai Nie and Tammy Garber. 2013. “Mathematical Problem Posing as a Measure of Curricular Effect on Students' Learning.Educational Studies in Mathematics 83no. 1 (May): 5769.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CandelaAmber G. 2016. “Using the Instructional Quality Assessment Observation Tool in a Professional Development Capacity.” In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting for the North American Chapter for the Psychology of Mathematics Education edited by Marcy B. WoodErin E. TurnerMarti Civil and Jennifer A. Eli p. 418 November 3–6 Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CandelaAmber G. 2019. “Teachers' Perspectives Using the Instructional Quality Assessment as a Professional Development Tool.” In Handbook of Research on Educator Preparation and Professional Learning edited by Drew PollyChristie Martin and Kenan Dikilitaş pp. 4158. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ChapinSuzanne H.Mary Catherine O'Connor and Nancy Canavan Anderson. 2013. Classroom Discussions in Math: A Teacher's Guide for Using Talk Moves to Support the Common Core and More Grades K–6. Vol. 6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CohenElizabeth G.Rachel A. LotanBeth A. Scarloss and Adele R. Arellano. 1999. “Complex Instruction: Equity in Cooperative Learning Classrooms.Theory into Practice 38no. 2 (Spring): 8086.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de AraujoZandraErin SmithJi-Yeong I and Matthew Sakow. 2018. “Preservice Teachers' Strategies for Teaching Mathematics with English Learners.” In Toward Equity and Social Justice in Mathematics Education edited by Tonya G. Bartell pp. 21739. Cam, Switzerland: Springer Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DixonJuli K.Lisa A. Brooks and Melissa R. Carli. 2019. Making Sense of Mathematics for Teaching the Small Group. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrouwsDouglas A.James E. TarrÓscar ChávezRuthmae SearsVictor M. Soria and Rukiye D. Taylan. 2013. “Curriculum and Implementation Effects on High School Students' Mathematics Learning from Curricula Representing Subject-Specific and Integrated Content Organizations.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 44no. 2 (March): 41663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herbel-EisenmannBeth A. and M. Lynn Breyfogle. 2005. “Questioning Our Patterns of Questioning.Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 10no. 9 (May): 48489.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herbel-EisenmannBeth A.Michael D. Steele and Michelle Cirillo. 2013. “(Developing) Teacher Discourse Moves: A Framework for Professional Development.Mathematics Teacher Educator 1no. 2 (March): 18196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LampertMagdalene. 2001. Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • MartinDanny Bernard. 2012. “Learning Mathematics while Black.The Journal of Educational Foundations 26nos. 1–2 (Winter–Spring): 4766.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McClureLynne. 2011. “Using Low Threshold High Ceiling Tasks.NRICH Project. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

  • MichaelsSarah and Catherine O'Connor. 2015. “Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussion.” In Socializing Intelligence through Talk and DialogueLauren B. ResnickChrista Asterhan and Sherice Clarke pp. 34762. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MichaelsSarahMary Catherine O'ConnorMegan Williams Hall and Lauren B. Resnick. 2010. Accountable Talk® Sourcebook. Pittsburgh, PA: Institute for Learning, University of Pittsburgh.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2014. Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O'ConnorMary Catherine and Sarah Michaels. 1996. “Shifting Participant Frameworks: Orchestrating Thinking Practices in Group Discussions.” In Discourse Learning and Schooling edited by Deborah Hicks pp. 63103. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchoenfeldAlan H. 2002. “Making Mathematics Work for All Children: Issues of Standards, Testing, and Equity.Educational Researcher 31no. 1 (January): 1325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SmithMargaret S. and Mary Kay Stein. 2018. 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Mathematics Discussions. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SteinMary Kay and Suzanne Lane. 1996. “Instructional Tasks and the Development of Student Capacity to Think and Reason: An Analysis of the Relationship between Teaching and Learning in a Reform Mathematics Project.Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 2 (1): 5080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 515 515 244
Full Text Views 937 937 106
PDF Downloads 409 409 54
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0