Preface
Author:
Julia Maria Aguirre University of Washington-Tacoma

Search for other papers by Julia Maria Aguirre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karen Mayfield-Ingram University of California, Berkeley

Search for other papers by Karen Mayfield-Ingram in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Danny Bernard Martin University of Illinois, Chicago

Search for other papers by Danny Bernard Martin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The increasingly political environment of educational reform—motivated by concerns about U.S. students’ lagging performance on international comparisons, the push for national learning standards, and stricter accountability measures—has subjected mathematics teachers and mathematics teaching practice to intense scrutiny by policymakers, educational researchers, and much of the general public.

In one way or another, teachers are being told that they are responsible for the poor mathematics performance of students. They are made to feel this responsibility on the local level, for students’ performance in schools, and on national and international levels, for the perceived drop in U.S. international competitiveness. They are being told that they lack the requisite mathematics content knowledge to teach students effectively. For many teachers, determinations of their effectiveness and the quality of their teaching have now become solely dependent on whether they can raise their students’ test scores.

Much of the discourse generated about teachers and teacher practice has been topdown, focused primarily on curriculum and content, and generated by voices far from the classroom. Often absent from this discourse are teachers’ own reflections on their work and the demands placed on them. Teaching is complex professional work that requires ongoing reflection on curriculum and content, as well as self-reflection—reflection about children and families, reflection about the role of mathematics in the lives of children and families, and even reflection about routine, everyday practice.

This book focuses on teacher reflection. Our goal is not to generate discourse about teachers. Instead, it is to engage in conversations with teachers, raising issues that we have seen in our individual and collective classroom experiences and that many teachers will recognize from their own experiences.

We have chosen to focus on teacher reflection and practice in the context of mathematics learning and identity development. That is, we have chosen to focus on understanding how teachers help students become powerful learners of mathematics and how students come to see themselves in relationship to mathematics learning, both inside and outside the classroom. Our commitment to teacher reflection is grounded in our desire to help teachers understand, appreciate, and draw on the backgrounds of students as strengths to further students’ mathematical development—especially those students who have not had eqitable access or opportunity to learn mathematics.

We acknowledge the dual role that mathematics has played as gatekeeper and gateway to various opportunities in society, and we recognize that mathematics has often been used to make judgments about intelligence. We call on teachers to reflect on these uses of mathematics. Further, because students do not come to school without the influences of their homes, communities, and cultures, we ask teachers to reflect on how the multiple identities that students are developing can influence their mathematics learning. Yet, we do not confine the conversation on mathematics learning to students. We ask teachers to reflect on their own learning experiences and how those experiences have shaped their senses of themselves as doers of mathematics and how their views of themselves as mathematics learners affect their classroom practice.

We also frame our conversation with teachers around issues of equity, focusing on fair and just treatment and a recognition of each child’s needs that allows every child to develop as a powerful mathematics learner and affirms his or her intellectual, cultural, racial, ethnic, and linguistic background. The concerns for equity in this book also include fair and just treatment and recognition of teachers and the highly skilled activity of teaching. We respect and understand the critical roles that teachers play in helping students learn, as well as the constraints that often have an impact on their work.

This book, which consists of eight chapters divided into three parts, is designed to help teachers move beyond an awareness of the need to reflect on their teaching to a commitment to transform their teaching to include equity-based practices. An epilogue offers final reflections. A list of discussion questions appears at the end of each chapter to promote further dialogue and self-reflection. Readers can also use the access code on the title page to find specific reflection tools and activities at NCTM’s More4U website (www.nctm.org/more4u).

Part 1 focuses on mathematics learning and identity. Chapter 1 addresses important themes related to the purposes of learning mathematics, equity, and shifts needed to attend to learning and identity. Chapter 2 discusses the connection between mathematics learning and student identity. This chapter discusses why teachers need to attend to this linkage to empower young mathematical minds. Chapter 3 shifts that identity focus to teachers, calling for reflection on the impact of one’s own mathematics learning identity on instructional beliefs and classroom practice. Teacher identity is inextricably linked with instructional vision and practice, which in turn shape the mathematics experience of students.

Part 2 describes five equity-based instructional practices designed to strengthen mathematics learning and positive mathematics identity:

  • Going deep with mathematics

  • Leveraging multiple mathematical competencies

  • Affirming mathematics learners’ identities

  • Challenging spaces of marginality

  • Drawing on multiple resources of knowledge

The chapters in this part use classroom vignettes to bring these practices to life. Chapter 4 describes a middle school mathematics teacher’s practice that cultivates mathematical agency and empowers students to examine claims by using mathematical evidence. Chapter 5 focuses on the way that an elementary teacher builds on students’ strengths to foster their engagement with mathematics and thus support their learning of mathematics. Chapter 6 shines the spotlight on assessment. Drawing on the five equity practices, this chapter specifically discusses the role of meaningful feedback on typical classroom “tests”—feedback that can deepen students’ learning and help develop their sense of themselves as mathematics learners. This discussion also highlights ways that teachers can learn to recognize various experiences and knowledge that students bring to bear on assessments and that demonstrate what they know and can do.

Part 3 focuses on the importance of engaging families and communities as true partners in supporting mathematics learning and positive mathematics identity development. Chapter 7 discusses routine strategies such as family newsletters and parent-teacher conferences, which can be enhanced to strengthen relationships with parents and effectively communicate the teacher’s mathematics vision and the students’ progress. Chapter 8 moves beyond the classroom walls to highlight ways in which teachers and schools can partner with parents and communities to support mathematics learning and provide complementary resources to help children learn mathematics.

The epilogue offers final reflections about important ideas in the book and ways for teachers to continue deepening their equity-based practices to strengthen mathematics learning and positive mathematics identity development for children.

In writing this book, we have drawn on our own experiences in K–8 classrooms; our experiences with parents, teachers, and children; our experiences as teachers in various contexts and as teacher educators in preservice and in-service contexts; and, for two of us (Julia Aguirre and Karen Mayfield-Ingram), our experiences as parents of schoolaged children. Each of us has a lifelong history of commitment to issues of equity in mathematics education, focusing on historically marginalized students and families. Our professional experiences and practices have been devoted to empowering students with mathematics to help them realize a full range of educational and life opportunities.

Our own journeys in mathematics, including being identified by teachers for accelerated tracks in mathematics, participating in academic enrichment programs for minorities and women, experiencing undergraduate and graduate study in mathematics and education, and being mentored in the areas of mathematics and mathematics education, have also shaped the writing of this book. We have known firsthand the impact of teachers on our lives in relation to mathematics learning.

Moreover, the writing of this book has been shaped by our own racial and cultural identities as well as the ways that we have come to see ourselves as learners and doers of mathematics as a result of those identities. Racially, ethnically, and culturally, for example, we self-identify with particular social categories (African American, Latina, multilingual, multiethnic, biracial) that have been marginalized in societal and school settings, especially with respect to mathematics. These social categories are both personal and political and have evolving histories and meanings, and we acknowledge the sociopolitical and power implications of these identifications.

We acknowledge that these categories and others—for instance, “white,” “black,” “Asian,” and “Native American”—are negotiated, and each of us makes our own sense of what these terms mean and whether we choose to make them our own. We also acknowledge the shared history and experiences of group members despite different labels. For example, we use the labels “African American” and “black” to encompass the diverse ways that group members of the African diaspora self-identify and are identified by others. We use “Latina/o” as a pan-ethnic label to express the cultural and political solidarities of people who are descendants of or natives of a Western hemisphere country south of the United States, including Mexico and the countries of Central and South America and the Caribbean (Hurtado and Gurin 2004). “Latina/o” acknowledges Indigenous, African, and European ancestries that the label “Hispanic” does not. The categories “white” and “Asian” also include multiple identifications. In this book, we ask educators to recognize and critically reflect on how all of these terms are used in school discourses related to mathematics.

We hope that this book, in which we bring to bear our professional and personal experiences, will be an essential resource for teachers, teacher educators, and education researchers interested in teacher development, equity, learning, and identity. We trust that it will also prove useful to parents and school administrators who wish to support teachers in the teaching of mathematics. Most important, we hope that we have succeeded in shaping this book in such a way that it will push our collective thinking and practice to give our nation’s youth a better preparation for learning mathematics and developing positive mathematics identities that will advance their own educational, career, and life opportunities. We hope that the examples presented in this book will resonate with teachers and provide opportunities for them to reflect critically on their beliefs and practices.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for, and feel very fortunate to have been given, the opportunity to write this book. We owe a great deal of thanks to NCTM’s Education Materials Committee. We are especially grateful to Myrna Jacobs, NCTM publications manager, for her patience and support for this project. We offer special thanks to our teacher colleagues Andy Coons, Desiree LeSage, Shelley Rafter, Susan Sabol, and Niral Shah for their insights, examples, and constructive critiques that helped us to think through some of the issues raised in this book. We would also like to thank our families for their ongoing support and inspiration.

We dedicate this book to all young students, past, present, and future, who continually teach us what is necessary to help them learn and grow mathematically and to the educators, families, and communities who, in the face of many challenges, demonstrate their dedication, love, and support for young people.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Adams, Kimberly S., and Sandra L. Christenson. “Trust and the Family-School Relationship: Examination of Parent-Teacher Differences in Elementary and Secondary Grades.Journal of School Psychology 38, no. 5 (2000): 47797.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aguirre, Julia. “Privileging Mathematics and Equity in Teacher Education: Framework, Counter-Resistance Strategies and Reflections from a Latina Mathematics Educator.In Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education, edited by Brian Greer, Swapna Mukhopadhyay, Arthur B. Powell, and Sharon Nelson-Barber, pp. 295319. New York: Routledge, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aguirre, Julia M., Erin E. Turner, Tonya Gau Bartell, Corey Drake, Mary Q. Foote, and Amy Roth McDuffie. “Analyzing Effective Mathematics Lessons for English Learners: A Multiple Mathematical Lens Approach.In Beyond Good Teaching: Advancing Mathematics Education for ELLs, edited by Sylvia Celedón-Pattichis and Nora Ramirez, pp. 20722. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ashlock, Robert B. Error Patterns in Computation: Using Error Patterns to Improve Instruction. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beijaard, Douwe, Paulien C. Meijer, and Nico Verloop. “Reconsidering Research on Teachers’ Professional Identity.Teaching and Teacher Education 20, no. 2 (2004): 10728.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berry, Robert Q., III. “Access to Upper-Level Mathematics: The Stories of African American Middle School Boys Who Are Successful with School Mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39 (2008): 46488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Black, Paul, Christine Harrison, Clare Lee, Bethan Marshall, and Dylan Wiliam. “Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.Phi Delta Kappan 86, no. 1 (2004): 921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blum-Anderson, Judy. “Increasing Enrollment in Higher-Level Mathematics Classes through the Affective Domain.School Science and Mathematics 92, no. 8 (1992): 43336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boaler, Jo. Experiencing School Mathematics: Traditional and Reform Approaches to Teaching and Their Impact on Student Learning. Rev. ed. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boaler, Jo. What’s Math Got to Do with It? Helping Children Learn to Love Their Least Favorite Subject—and Why It’s Important for America. New York: Viking, 2008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brenner, Mary E., and Judit N. Moschkovich. “Everyday and Academic Mathematics in the Classroom.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph 11. Reston, Va.: NCTM, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christenson, Sandra L.The Family-School Partnership: An Opportunity to Promote the Learning Competence of All Students.School Psychology Review 33, no. 1 (2004): 83104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Civil, Marta. “Building on Community Knowledge: An Avenue to Equity in Mathematics Education.In Improving Access to Mathematics: Diversity and Equity in the Classroom, edited by Na’ilah Suad Nasir and Paul Cobb, pp. 10517. New York: Teachers College Press, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Civil, Marta, and Rosi Andrade. “Collaborative Practice with Parents: The Role of the Researcher as Mediator.In Collaboration in Teacher Education: Examples from the Context of Mathematics Education, edited by Andrea Peter-Koop, Vânia Santos-Wagner, C. J. Breen, and A. J. C. Begg, pp. 15368. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Civil, Marta, and Emily Bernier. “Exploring Images of Parental Participation in Mathematics Education: Challenges and Possibilities.Mathematical Thinking and Learning 8, no. 3 (2006): 30930.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coates, Grace Dávila, and Virginia Thompson. Family Math II: Achieving Success in Mathematics, K–6. Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Hall of Science, 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cornell, Stephen E., and Douglas Hartmann. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge Press, 1998.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeCastro-Ambrosetti, Debra, and Grace Cho. “Do Parents Value Education? Teachers’ Perceptions of Minority Parents.Multicultural Education 13, no. 2 (2005): 4446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Desimone, Laura. “Linking Parent Involvement with Student Achievement: Do Race and Income Matter?Journal of Educational Research 93, September/October 1999, 1130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dorner, Lisa M., Marjorie Faulstich Orellana, and Christine P. Li Grining. “‘I Helped My Mom,’ and It Helped Me: Translating the Skills of Language Brokers into Improved Standardized Test Scores.American Journal of Education 113, no. 3 (2007): 45178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drake, Corey, James P. Spillane, and Kimberly Hufferd-Ackles. “Storied Identities: Teacher Learning and Subject-Matter Context.Journal of Curriculum Studies 33, no. 1 (2011): 123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epstein, Joyce. “Effects of Teacher Practices of Parent Involvement Change in Student Achievement in Reading and Math.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La., April 23–27, 1984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epstein, Joyce. “Advances in Family, Community, and School Partnerships.Community Education Journal 23, no. 3 (1996): 1015.

  • EQUALS/FAMILY MATH. Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at Berkeley. http://www.lawrencehallofscience.org/equals.

  • Featherstone, Heather, Sandra Crespo, Lisa M. Jilk, Joy A. Oslund, Amy Noelle Parks, and Marcy B. Wood. Smarter Together! Collaboration and Equity in the Elementary Math Classroom. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • González, Norma, Rosi Andrade, Marta Civil, and Luis C. Moll. “Bridging Funds of Distributed Knowledge: Creating Zones of Practices in Mathematics.Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 6, nos. 1-2 (2001): 11532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gresalfi, Melissa Sommerfeld, and Paul Cobb. “Negotiating Identities for Mathematics Teaching in the Context of Professional Development.Journal of Mathematics Education 42, no. 3 (2011): 270304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gresalfi, Melissa S., Taylor Martin, Victoria Hand, and James Greeno. “Constructing Competence: An Analysis of Student Participation in the Activity Systems of Mathematics Classrooms.Educational Studies in Mathematics 70, no. 1 (2009): 4970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutiérrez, Rochelle. “Beyond Essentialism: The Complexity of Language in Teaching Mathematics to Latina/o Students.American Educational Research Journal 39, no. 4 (2002): 104788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutiérrez, Rochelle. “The Sociopolitical Turn in Mathematics Education.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 4, no. 0 (JRME Equity Special Issue) (2010): 132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gutstein, Eric. Reading and Writing the World with Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice. New York: Routledge, 2006.

  • Gutstein, Eric, and Bill Petersen. Rethinking Mathematics: Teaching Social Justice by the Numbers. Milwaukee, Wis.: Rethinking Schools, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Horn, Ilana. Strength in Numbers: Collaborative Learning in Secondary Mathematics. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hurtado, Aída, and Patricia Gurin. Chicana/o Identity in a Changing U.S. Society: Quién Soy? Quiénes Somos? Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jackson, Kara. “The Social Construction of Youth and Mathematics: The Case of a Fifth-Grade Classroom.In Mathematics Teaching, Learning, and Liberation in the Lives of Black Children, edited by Danny Bernard Martin, pp. 17599. New York: Routledge, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knapp, Andrea, Rachel Landers, and Vetrece Jefferson. Research Report on Parents and Children in MAAPS. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia, 2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kuhs, Therese M., and Deborah L. Ball. “Approaches to Teaching Mathematics: Mapping the Domains of Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions.Unpublished manuscript, National Center for Teacher Education, Michigan State University, 1986. http://staff.lib.msu.edu/corby/education/Approaches_to_Teaching_Mathematics.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lampert, Magdalene. Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2001.

  • Lee, Stacey J. Up Against Whiteness: Race, School, and Immigrant Youth. New York: Teachers College Press, 2005.

  • Lee, Stacey J.. Unraveling the “Model Minority” Stereotype: Listening to Asian American Youth. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Louie, Vivian. Compelled to Excel: Immigration, Education, and Opportunity among Chinese Americans. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manyak, Patrick C.‘What Did She Say?’: Translation in a Primary-Grade English Immersion Class.Multicultural Perspectives 6, no. 1 (2004): 1218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, Danny B. Mathematics Success and Failure among African American Youth: The Roles of Sociohistorical Context, Community Forces, School Influence, and Individual Agency. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, Danny B.Mathematics Learning and Participation as Racialized Forms of Experiences: African-American Parents Speak on the Struggle for Mathematics Literacy.Mathematical Thinking & Learning 8, no. 3 (2006): 197229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, Danny B.Liberating the Production of Knowledge about African American Children and Mathematics.In Mathematics Teaching, Learning, and Liberation in the Lives of Black Children, edited by Danny Bernard Martin, pp. 336. New York: Routledge, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Math and Parent Partners (MAPPS). University of Arizona. http://mapps.math.arizona.edu.

  • Mathematics Assessment Resource Service (MARS). Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative, 2010. http://www.svmimac.org/home.html.

  • Mayfield-Ingram, Karen, and Alma Ramirez. The Journey—Through Middle School Math. Berkeley, Calif.: EQUALS Programs, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at Berkeley, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller-Jones, Dalton, and Brian Greer. “Conceptions of Assessment of Mathematical Proficiency and Their Implications for Cultural Diversity.In Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education, edited by Brian Greer, Swapna Mukhopadhyay, Arthur B. Powell, and Sharon Nelson-Barber, 165–86. New York: Routledge, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Minke, Kathleen M., and Kellie J. Anderson. “Restructuring Routine Parent-Teacher Conferences: The Family-School Conference Model.Elementary School Journal 104, no. 1 (2003): 4969.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moschovich, Judit N.Learning Mathematics in Two Languages: Moving from Obstacles to Resources.In Changing the Faces of Mathematics: Perspectives on Multiculturalism and Gender Equity, edited by Walter Secada, pp. 8593. Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1999.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moschovich, Judit N.A Situated and Sociocultural Perspective on Bilingual Mathematics Learners.Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4, nos. 2-3 (2002): 189212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va.: NCTM, 1995.

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA Center and CCSSO). Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12 Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Research Council. Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Jeremy Kilpatrick, Jane Swafford, and Bradford Findell, eds. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001a.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Research Council. Improving Mathematics Education: Resources for Decision Making. Committee on Decisions That Count, Steve Leinwand and Gail Burrill, eds. Mathematical Sciences Education Board, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001b.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oakes, Jeannie. Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. 2nd ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2005.

  • Olsen, Brad. “‘I Am Large, I Contain Multitudes’: Teacher Identity as a Useful Frame for Research, Practice, and Diversity in Teacher Education.In Studying Diversity in Teacher Education, edited by Arnetha F. Ball and Cynthia A. Tyson, pp. 25773. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orellana, Marjorie Faulstich. Translating Childhoods: Immigrant Youth, Language, and Culture. Piscataway, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parrish, Sherry D. Number Talks: Helping Children Build Mental Math and Computation Strategies, Grades K-5. Sausalito, Calif.: Math Solutions, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peressini, Dominic D.The Portrayal of Parents in the School Mathematics Reform Literature: Locating the Context for Parental Involvement.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29 (1998): 55582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Remillard, Janine T., and Kara Jackson. “Old Math, New Math: Parents’ Experiences with Standards-Based Reform.Mathematical Thinking & Learning 8, no. 3 (2006): 23159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Russell, Susan Jo.Developing Computational Fluency with Whole Numbers.Teaching Children Mathematics 7, no. 3 (2000): 15458.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schoenfeld, Alan H.Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics.In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by Douglas A. Grouws, pp. 33470. New York: Macmillan; Reston, Va.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Simic-Muller, Ksenjia, Erin E. Turner, and Maura C. Varley. “Math Club Problem-Posing.Teaching Children Mathematics 16, no. 4 (2009): 20612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spielhagen, Frances R. The Algebra Solution to Mathematics Reform: Completing the Equation. New York: Teachers College Press, 2011.

  • Staats, Susan. “Somali Mathematics Terminology: A Community Exploration of Mathematics and Culture.In Multilingualism in Mathematics Classrooms: Global Perspectives, edited by Richard Barwell, pp. 3246. Bristol, Conn.: Multilingual Matters, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stein, Mary Kay, Margaret Schwan Smith, Marjorie A. Henningsen, and Edward A. Silver. Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction: A Casebook for Professional Development. New York: Teachers College Press, 2000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stinson, David. “Negotiating Sociocultural Discourses: The Counter-Storytelling of Academically (and Mathematically) Successful African American Male Students.American Educational Research Journal 45, no. 4 (2008): 9751010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stipek, Deborah, Karen B. Givvin, Julie M. Salmon, and Valanne L. MacGyvers. “Teacher Beliefs and Practices Related to Mathematics Instruction.Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (February 2001): 21326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tate, William F.Race, Retrenchment, and Reform of School Mathematics.Phi Delta Kappan 75, no. 6 (1994): 47784.

  • Turner, Erin. “Critical Mathematical Agency: Urban Middle School Students Engage in Significant Mathematics to Understand, Critique, and Act upon Their World.” PhD diss., University of Texas, 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turner, Erin E., Corey Drake, Amy Roth McDuffie, Julia M. Aguirre, Tonya Gau Bartell, and Mary Q. Foote. “Promoting Equity in Mathematics Teacher Preparation: A Framework for Advancing Teacher Learning of Children’s Multiple Mathematics Knowledge Bases.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 15, no. 1 (2012): 6782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turner, Erin E., and Beatriz T. Font Strawhun. “Posing Problems That Matter: Investigating School Overcrowding.Teaching Children Mathematics 13, no. 9 (2007): 45763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turner, Erin, and Sylvia Celedón-Pattichis. “Problem Solving and Mathematical Discourse among Latino/a Kindergarten Students: An Analysis of Opportunities to Learn.Journal of Latinos and Education 10, no. 2 (2011): 14669.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Everyday Mathematics. Chicago: McGraw Hill, 2007.

  • Yan, Wenfan, and Qiuyun Lin. “Parent Involvement and Mathematics Achievement: Contrast across Racial and Ethnic Groups.Journal of Educational Research 99, no. 2 (2005): 116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 675 201 11
PDF Downloads 1455 783 53