Student Argumentation Work Sample Sorting Task and Teachers’ Evaluations of Arguments

Ball, D. L., Ben-Peretz, M., & Cohen, R. B. (2014). Records of practice and the development of collective professional knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 317–335.

Ball, D. L., Ben-Peretz, M., & Cohen, R. B. (2014). Records of practice and the development of collective professional knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 317–335.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Granada Learning.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Bleiler, S. K., Thompson, D. R., & Krajčevski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: Proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105–127.

Bleiler, S. K., Thompson, D. R., & Krajčevski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: Proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105–127.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Conner, A., Kosko, K. W., Staples, M., Cirillo, M., Bieda, K., & Newton, J. (2017). Conceptions and consequences of what we call argumentation, justification and proof. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1464–1473). Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.

Conner, A., Kosko, K. W., Staples, M., Cirillo, M., Bieda, K., & Newton, J. (2017). Conceptions and consequences of what we call argumentation, justification and proof. In E. Galindo & J. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1464–1473). Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. American Mathematical Society, 7, 234–283.

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. American Mathematical Society, 7, 234–283.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.

Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 389–399.

Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 389–399.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203–235.

Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203–235.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Koestler, C., Felton, M. D., Bieda, K. N., & Otten, S. (2013). Connecting the NCTM process standards and the CCSSM practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Koestler, C., Felton, M. D., Bieda, K. N., & Otten, S. (2013). Connecting the NCTM process standards and the CCSSM practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 61–88.

Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(1), 61–88.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conception of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405.

Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conception of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Sage.

Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Sage.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Morris, A. K. (2007). Factors affecting pre-service teachers’ evaluations of the validity of students’ mathematical arguments in classroom contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 479–522.

Morris, A. K. (2007). Factors affecting pre-service teachers’ evaluations of the validity of students’ mathematical arguments in classroom contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 479–522.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Fagan, J. (2019). The student discourse observation tool: Supporting teachers in noticing justifying and generalizing. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 7(2), 57–74.

Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Fagan, J. (2019). The student discourse observation tool: Supporting teachers in noticing justifying and generalizing. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 7(2), 57–74.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA Center & CCSSO). (2010). Common core statestandards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA Center & CCSSO). (2010). Common core statestandards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.

Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Simon, M., & Blume, G. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 3–31.

Simon, M., & Blume, G. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 3–31.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Staples, M., & Lesseig, K. (2020). Advancing a teacher-centered perspective on support-for-claims terminology. For the Learning of Mathematics, 40(1), 28–35.

Staples, M., & Lesseig, K. (2020). Advancing a teacher-centered perspective on support-for-claims terminology. For the Learning of Mathematics, 40(1), 28–35.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Staples, M., & Truxaw, M. (2009). A journey with justification: Issues arising from the implementation and evaluation of the Math ACCESS Project. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5 (pp. 827–835). Georgia State University.

Staples, M., & Truxaw, M. (2009). A journey with justification: Issues arising from the implementation and evaluation of the Math ACCESS Project. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5 (pp. 827–835). Georgia State University.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Strachota, S., Hummer, J., Cirillo, M., Newton, J., Kosko, K.W., Staples, M., & Weber, K. (2016). Conceptions of proof, argumentation, and justification. InM. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (p. 712). University of Arizona.

Strachota, S., Hummer, J., Cirillo, M., Newton, J., Kosko, K.W., Staples, M., & Weber, K. (2016). Conceptions of proof, argumentation, and justification. In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (p. 712). University of Arizona.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321.

Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Stylianides, G., Stylianides, A., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Stylianides, G., Stylianides, A., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

Wagner, P. A., Smith, R. C., Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Using Toulmin’s model to develop prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of collective argumentation. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 8–26.

Wagner, P. A., Smith, R. C., Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Using Toulmin’s model to develop prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of collective argumentation. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 8–26.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation