The pervasiveness of digital technology creates an imperative for mathematics teacher educators to prepare preservice teachers (PSTs) to select technology to support students’ mathematical development. We report on research conducted on an assignment created for and implemented in secondary mathematics methods courses requiring PSTs to select and evaluate digital mathematics tools. We found that PSTs primarily focused on pedagogical fidelity (ease of use), did not consider mathematical fidelity (accuracy), and at times superficially attended to cognitive fidelity (how well the tool reflects students’ mathematical thinking processes) operationalized as the CCSS for Mathematical Practice and Five Strands of Mathematical Proficiency. We discuss implications for implementing the assignment and suggestions for addressing PSTs’ challenges with identifying the mathematical practices and five strands.

Contributor Notes

^{*}Charmaine Mangram, University of Hawai’i at Mãnoa, USA, cmangram@hawaii.edu

Kathy Liu Sun, Santa Clara University, USA, ksun@scu.edu

Battey, D., Kafai, Y., & Franke, M. (2005). Evaluation of mathematical inquiry in commercial rational number software. In C.Vrasidas & G. V.Glass (Eds.), Preparing Teachers to Teach with Technology (pp. 241–256). Information Age Publishing.

Battey, D., Kafai, Y., & Franke, M. (2005). Evaluation of mathematical inquiry in commercial rational number software. In C.Vrasidas & G. V.Glass (Eds.), )| false

Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Digital tools for algebra education: Criteria and evaluation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(1), 45.

Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Digital tools for algebra education: Criteria and evaluation. )| false

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better.Harvard Education Press.

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). )| false

Dick, T. (2007). Keeping the faith: Fidelity in technological tools for mathematics education. In W. G.Blume & M. K.Heid (Eds.), Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Vol. 2. Cases and perspectives. (pp. 333–339). Information Age.

Dick, T. (2007). Keeping the faith: Fidelity in technological tools for mathematics education. In W. G.Blume & M. K.Heid (Eds.), )| false

Dick, T. P., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011). Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and sense making (pp. xi–xvii). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Dick, T. P., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011). )| false

Hollebrands, K. (2017). A framework to guide the development of a Teaching Mathematics with Technology Massive Open Online Course. In E.Galindo & J.Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.

Hollebrands, K. (2017). A framework to guide the development of a Teaching Mathematics with Technology Massive Open Online Course. In E.Galindo & J.Newton (Eds.), )| false

Johnston, C., & Suh, J. (2009). Pre-service elementary teachers planning for math instruction: Use of technology tools. In I.Gibson, R.Weber, K.McFerrin, R.Carlsen, & D.Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009–Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3561–3566). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Johnston, C., & Suh, J. (2009). Pre-service elementary teachers planning for math instruction: Use of technology tools. In I.Gibson, R.Weber, K.McFerrin, R.Carlsen, & D.Willis (Eds.), )| false

Larkin, K. (2015). The search for fidelity in geometry apps: An exercise in futility?. In M.Marshman, V.Geiger, & A.Bennison (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 341–348). MERGA.

Larkin, K. (2015). The search for fidelity in geometry apps: An exercise in futility?. In M.Marshman, V.Geiger, & A.Bennison (Eds.), )| false

Martin, W. G., & Gobstein, H. (2020). Overview of the mathematics teacher education partnership. In W. G.Martin, B. R.Lawler, A. E.Lischka, & W. M.Smith (Eds.), The mathematics teacher education partnership: The power of a networked improvement community to transform secondary mathematics teacher preparation (pp. 3–23). Information Age Publishing.

Martin, W. G., & Gobstein, H. (2020). Overview of the mathematics teacher education partnership. In W. G.Martin, B. R.Lawler, A. E.Lischka, & W. M.Smith (Eds.), )| false

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Author.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). )| false

Sherman, M. F., Cayton, C., & Chandler, K. (2017). Supporting PSTs in using appropriate tools strategically: A learning sequence for developing technology tasks that support students’ mathematical thinking.Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(2), 122–157.

Sherman, M. F., Cayton, C., & Chandler, K. (2017). Supporting PSTs in using appropriate tools strategically: A learning sequence for developing technology tasks that support students’ mathematical thinking.)| false

Sinclair, M. P. (2003). Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 289–317.

Sinclair, M. P. (2003). Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials. )| false

Smith, R. C., Shin, D., & Kim, S. (2017). Prospective and current secondary mathematics teachers' criteria for evaluating mathematical cognitive technologies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(5), 659–681.

Smith, R. C., Shin, D., & Kim, S. (2017). Prospective and current secondary mathematics teachers' criteria for evaluating mathematical cognitive technologies. )| false

Thomas, A., & Edson, A. J. (2019). A framework for teachers’ evaluation of digital instructional materials: Integrating mathematics teaching practices with technology use in K-8 classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 351–372.

Thomas, A., & Edson, A. J. (2019). A framework for teachers’ evaluation of digital instructional materials: Integrating mathematics teaching practices with technology use in K-8 classrooms. )| false