Learning to Launch Cognitively Demanding Tasks: A Practice-Based Unit for Secondary Methods

Author:
Mark A. Creager University of Southern Indiana

Search for other papers by Mark A. Creager in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rachel B. Snider The College of New Jersey

Search for other papers by Rachel B. Snider in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Christopher W. Parrish University of South Alabama

Search for other papers by Christopher W. Parrish in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Cognitively demanding tasks provide important opportunities for students to develop an understanding of mathematics; however, they are challenging to launch and implement. The authors designed a secondary methods unit on launching tasks. Participants in the study were enrolled in five different methods courses. Using a noticing framework, findings suggest that by engaging in the unit, preservice teachers developed a greater understanding of the four aspects of an effective task launch. When viewing video examples, preservice teachers were able to talk about the four aspects of a task launch with increased specificity. Additionally, they began to identify ways of developing common language without reducing cognitive demand. We discuss implications of this work and offer suggestions for future teacher education research.

Contributor Notes

Mark A. Creager, University of Southern Indiana, 8600 University Blvd., Evansville, IN 47712, macreager@usi.edu

Rachel B. Snider, The College of New Jersey, PO Box 7718, Ewing, NJ 08628-0718, sniderr@tcnj.edu

Christopher W. Parrish, University of South Alabama, University Commons 3124, 307 N. University Blvd., Mobile, AL 36688, parrish@southalabama.edu

(Corresponding author is Mark Creager macreager@usi.edu)
(Corresponding author is Rachel Snider sniderr@tcnj.edu)
(Corresponding author is Christopher Parrish parrish@southalabama.edu)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Mathematics Teacher Educator
  • 1.

    Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE). (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Author.

  • 2.

    Barone, T., Berliner, D. C., Blanchard, J., Casanova, U., & McGowan, T. (1996). A future for teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 11081149). Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teacher College Record, 110(3), 608645.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2009). Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers’ classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(2), 119156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2011). A ‘task-centric approach’ to professional development: Enhancing and sustaining mathematics teachers’ ability to implement cognitively challenging mathematical tasks. ZDM, 43(6–7), 965977.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Boston, M. D., & Wolf, M. K. (2006). Assessing academic rigor in mathematics instruction: The development of the instructional quality assessment toolkit (CSE Technical Report 672). http://cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/r669.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Chapin, S. H., O’Conner, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2013). Talk moves: A teacher’s guide for using classroom discussion in math, Grades K–6. (3rd ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 20552100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Jackson, K. J., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L. K., & Shahan, E. C. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Jackson, K. J., Shahan, E. C., Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. A. (2012). Launching complex tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(1), 2429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipps, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 41(2), 169202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Jacobs, V. R., & Spangler, D. A. (2017). Research on core practices in K–12 mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 766792). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Jordan, B. (1989). Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Social Science Medicine, 28(9), 925944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Lessig, K., Casey, S., Monson, D., Krupa, E. E., & Huey, M. (2016). Developing an interview module to support secondary PST’s noticing of student thinking. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), 2946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Lobato, J., Clarke, D., & Ellis, A. (2005). Initiating and eliciting in teaching: A reformation of telling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 101136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge Falmer.

  • 18.

    McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Bolson, C., Turner, E. E., Aguirre, J. M., Bartell, T. G., Drake, C., & Land, T. (2014). Using video analysis to support prospective K–8 teachers’ noticing of students’ multiple mathematical knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(3), 245270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Author.

  • 20.

    National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Authors.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Santagata, R. (2011). From teacher noticing to a framework analyzing and improving classroom lessons. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics Teacher Noticing (pp. 152168). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J. N., Eisenhardt, S., Tassel, J., & Yoder, M. (2013). Prospective elementary schools teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(5), 379397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Selling, S. K., & Baldinger, E. E. (2016). Reasoning about telling in rehearsals of discussions: Considering what, when and how to “tell"? In M. B. Wood, E. E. Turner, M. Civil, & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. University of Arizona.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383396). Erlbaum.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2002). Learning to notice as a focus for professional development. Classroom Leadership, 5(9), 16.

  • 26.

    Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teacher’s ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematical project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 5080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100137.

  • 30.

    van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 134151). Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1530 354 10
Full Text Views 453 34 1
PDF Downloads 639 61 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0