Teachers and mathematics teacher education scholars have identified field experiences and quality mentoring as influential components of math teacher preparation and development. Yet, quality mentoring is a complex and demanding practice. Providing educative feedback to novices, particularly that which encourages reflection versus evaluation, can be challenging work for mentors. To study the potential of an intervention for providing professional development for mentors, I worked with pairs of mentors and prospective teachers (PSTs) offering Smith's (2009) noticing and wondering language as a way of structuring mentoring conversations that maintain both descriptive and interpretive analytic stances. Analysis of before and after conversations provided evidence of how mentor-PST pairs adopted noticing and wondering language, and in particular illuminated the ways in which the language structure might support interpretive mentoring conversations for studying teaching. The results suggest that mathematics teacher educators may want to consider what makes wondering challenging work and how to best support wondering in educative mentoring conversations.

Contributor Notes

Sarah A. Roller; Department of Curriculum and Instruction, 301 Sparkman Dr., Roberts Hall 311, Huntsville, AL 35899; sar0022@uah.edu

(Corresponding author is Roller sar0022@uah.edu)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Mathematics Teacher Educator
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1477 397 90
Full Text Views 349 55 4
PDF Downloads 542 85 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0