Integrating Pedagogy and Mathematics Content in Content-Focused Professional Development

Author:
Liza Bondurant Mississippi State University

Search for other papers by Liza Bondurant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joey Rutherford University of Mississippi

Search for other papers by Joey Rutherford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Shannon Sharp University of Mississippi

Search for other papers by Shannon Sharp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

In this Perspective on Practice, we describe how we interpreted, built on, and adapted the design principles shared in “The Content-Focused Methods Course: A Model for Integrating Pedagogy and Mathematics Content” by Steele and Hillen (2012). Using evidence of learning from that report as a foundation, we provide insights into how integrating pedagogy and mathematics content in content-focused professional development (CFPD) influenced our evidence of learning.

Contributor Notes

Liza Bondurant, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762; lbondurant@colled.msstate.edu

Joey Rutherford, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677; glruther@olemiss.edu

Shannon Sharp, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677; srsharp1@olemiss.edu

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Mathematics Teacher Educator
  • American Institutes for Research. (2024). MQI coaching: Improving the mathematical quality of instruction. https://www.air.org/resource/mqi-coaching-improving-mathematical-quality-instruction

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cope, L. (2014). Task analysis and implementation activities as vehicles for middle school math teacher growth. Delta Journal of Education, 4(2), 1123. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gGwG_L4gX0WLAgxdFbpXFOoDZfgTaK_7/view?usp=drive_lin

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cope, L., & Huber, J. (2015). The impact of a professional development program on middle school math teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Delta Journal of Education, 5(2), 1932. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1idGqJuBJK18eeBUbf5gmAjvbDrBQhPQH/view?usp=drive_link

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cordero-Siy, E., & Ghousseini, H. (2022). Supporting understanding using representations. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 115(6), 394403. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2021.0155

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 1130. https://doi.org/10.1086/428763

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mathematics Assessment Project. (2024). Lessons: Index of classroom challenges. https://www.map.mathshell.org/lessons.php

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2024). Process standards. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/Process/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schettino, C. (2013). Dismantling the birdcage: Adolescent girls’ attitudes towards learning mathematics with a relational pedagogy in a problem-based environment (Publication No. 3567822) [Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steele, M. D., & Hillen, A. F. (2012). The content-focused methods course: A model for integrating pedagogy and mathematics content. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(1), 5370. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.1.0053

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 68 68 68
Full Text Views 21 21 21
PDF Downloads 30 30 30
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0