Attending to Coherence Among Research Questions, Methods, and Claims in Coding Studies

Author:
Jennifer A. Czocher Texas State University

Search for other papers by Jennifer A. Czocher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Kathleen Melhuish Texas State University

Search for other papers by Kathleen Melhuish in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

We consider a kind of study common in mathematics education research: one that allocates qualitative data to categories in a theoretical or conceptual framework. These studies sometimes lack coherence among research questions, sampling and analysis methods, and claims, which can be attributed to tensions in how these aspects are framed. We ground our discussion in examples from five published studies, focusing on the methodological and reporting decisions that increase coherence: answering research questions from the same perspective they are asked (using a variance or a process lens), using (relative) frequencies properly to warrant claims, employing a coherent sampling strategy, and making appropriate generalizations. We argue that attending to coherence can increase the quality and contribution of coding studies.

Footnotes

We would like to thank Eva Thanheiser and Jessica Bishop for their thoughtful critiques of early drafts of this manuscript.

Contributor Notes

Jennifer A. Czocher, Department of Mathematics, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666; czocher.1@txstate.edu

Kathleen Melhuish, Department of Mathematics, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666; melhuish@txstate.edu

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  • Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed., pp. 222248). Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Darragh, L. (2018). Loving and loathing: Portrayals of school mathematics in young adult fiction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 178209. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0178

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Freitas, E., Lerman, S., & Parks, A. N. (2017). Qualitative methods. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 159182). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 1623. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022004016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 5982. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Crespo, S., Matthews, P. G., & Lichtenstein, E. K. (2022a). The practice of reviewing and its proactive role in building the field of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 174180. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Crespo, S., Matthews, P. G., & Lichtenstein, E. K. (2022b). What the current editorial team values in reviews for JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(4), 248254. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0053

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kop, P. M. G. M., Janssen, F. J. J. M., Drijvers, P. H. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). The relation between graphing formulas by hand and students’ symbol sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 137161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09970-3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

  • Louie, N. L. (2017). The culture of exclusion in mathematics education and its persistence in equity-oriented teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 488519. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.5.0488

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279301. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2021). The importance of qualitative research for investigating causation. Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 378388. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000219

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melhuish, K. (2018). Three conceptual replication studies in group theory. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(1), 938. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ragin, C. C. (2004). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 123138). Rowman & Littlefield.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

  • Schukajlow, S., & Krug, A. (2014). Do multiple solutions matter? Prompting multiple solutions, interest, competence, and autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 497533. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0497

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

  • Tarr, J. E., Grouws, D. A., Chávez, Ó., & Soria, V. M. (2013). The effects of content organization and curriculum implementation on students’ mathematics learning in second-year high school courses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 683729. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0683

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thanheiser, E. (2009). Preservice elementary school teachers’ conceptions of multidigit whole numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 251281. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.3.0251

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walton, J. (1992). Making the theoretical case. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 121138). Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitacre, I., & Nickerson, S. D. (2016). Prospective elementary teachers making sense of multidigit multiplication: Leveraging resources. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 270307. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.3.0270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, S. R., & Leatham, K. R. (2017). Journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 369396. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0369

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2739 2739 42
Full Text Views 289 289 9
PDF Downloads 450 450 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0