Fixing the Crooked Heart: How Aesthetic Practices Support Sense Making in Mathematical Play

Author:
Lara Jasien CPM Educational Program, Elk Grove, CA

Search for other papers by Lara Jasien in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Ilana Horn Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Search for other papers by Ilana Horn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

We build on mathematicians’ descriptions of their work and conceptualize mathematics as an aesthetic endeavor. Invoking the anthropological meaning of practice, we claim that mathematical aesthetic practices shape meanings of and appreciation (or distaste) for particular manifestations of mathematics. To see learners’ spontaneous mathematical aesthetic practices, we situate our study in an informal context featuring design-centered play with mathematical objects. Drawing from video data that support inferences about children’s perspectives, we use interaction analysis to examine one child’s mathematical aesthetic practices, highlighting the emergence of aesthetic problems whose resolution required engagement in mathematics sense making. As mathematics educators seek to broaden access, our empirical findings challenge commonsense understandings about what and where mathematics is, opening possibilities for designs for learning.

Footnotes

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DRL-1643313. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. We are deeply indebted to the NSF’s late Karen King, whose advocacy for this project made this research possible; Christopher Danielson, for his design of and invitation to Math On-A-Stick; Melissa Gresalfi (project co-PI), for her feedback and encouragement; Nathalie Sinclair and Leona Schauble, for multiple rounds of conceptual and analytic feedback; Rogers Hall, for methodological guidance; the early members of the Playful Mathematics Learning Team (Panchompoo [Fai] Wisittanawat, Kate Chapman, and Amanda Bell), for research design and data collection; and our reviewers and JRME editor Patricio Herbst, whose expertise helped us clarify the manuscript’s contribution.

Contributor Notes

Lara Jasien, CPM Educational Program, 9498 Little Rapids Way, Elk Grove, CA 95758; larajasien@cpm.org

Ilana Horn, Vanderbilt University, Peabody 230 GPC, 230 Appelton Pl., Nashville, TN 37203; ilana.horn@vanderbilt.edu

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  • Albers, P., Frederick, T., & Cowan, K. (2009). Features of gender: An analysis of the visual texts of third grade children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 234260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798409105588

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645668. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847701600601

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1983). The art of problem posing. Erlbaum.

  • Bush, S. B., Karp, K. S., Bennett, V. M., Popelka, L., & Nadler, J. (2013). Framing measurement: An art gallery installation. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(8), 474483. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.8.0474

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bush, S. B., Karp, K. S., Nadler, J., & Gibbons, K. (2016). Using artwork to explore proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 22(4), 216225. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.22.4.0216

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheng, E. (2015). How to bake π: An edible exploration of the mathematics of mathematics. Basic Books.

  • Cipoletti, B., & Wilson, N. (2004). Turning origami into the language of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(1), 2631. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.10.1.0026

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Civil, M. (2002). Everyday mathematics, mathematicians’ mathematics, and school mathematics: Can we bring them together? In M. E. Brenner & J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Everyday and academic mathematics in the classroom (pp. 4062). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.2307/749964

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9081-0

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, P. J. (1985). What do I know? A study of mathematical self-awareness. The College Mathematics Journal, 16(1), 2241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1985.11972847

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600378

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. Minton, Balch & Co.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.

  • Duckworth, E. (1972). The having of wonderful ideas. Harvard Educational Review, 42(2), 217231. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.42.2.g71724846u525up3

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elkind, D. (2008). The power of play: Learning what comes naturally. American Journal of Play, 1(1), 16. https://www.journalofplay.org/sites/www.journalofplay.org/files/pdf-articles/1-1-article-elkind-the-power-of-play.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fiori, N., & Selling, S. K. (2016). Truth isn’t everything: Promoting aesthetically guided choice in mathematical work. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 219234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geertz, C. (2003). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 143168). AltaMira Press. (Original work published 1973)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 26(4/5), 515543. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, R. (1996). Representation as shared activity: Situated cognition and Dewey’s cartography of experience. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 209238. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0503_3

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 5(1), 329350. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001553

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, M. (1994). Finding common threads: Researching the mathematics in traditionally female work. In D. Coben (Ed.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference of Adults Learning Maths–A Research Forum (pp. 1823). Goldsmith’s College, University of London.—

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacobs, J. E., Hiebert, J., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Garnier, H., & Wearne, D. (2006). Does eighth-grade mathematics teaching in the United States align with the NCTM Standards? Results from the TIMSS 1995 and 1999 video studies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(1), 532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self‐competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jasien, L., & Gresalfi, M. (2021). The role of participatory identity in learners’ hybridization of activity across context. Journal of the Learning Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1940186

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keifert, D., & Stevens, R. (2018). Inquiry as a members’ phenomenon: Young children as competent inquirers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 240278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1528448

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kelton, M. L., & Ma, J. Y. (2018). Reconfiguring mathematical settings and activity through multi-party, whole-body collaboration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(2), 177196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9805-8

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koichu, B., Katz, E., & Berman, A. (2017). Stimulating student aesthetic response to mathematical problems by means of manipulating the extent of surprise. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 4257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.02.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520949904

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 6794). Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

  • Litke, E. G. (2015). The state of the gate: A description of instructional practice in algebra in five urban districts [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University]. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:16461050

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lord, N. (2016). Constructing the 15th pentagon that tiles the plane. The Mathematical Gazette, 100(547), 154158. https://doi.org/10.1017/mag.2016.28

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ma, J. Y. (2016). Designing disruptions for productive hybridity: The case of walking scale geometry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 335371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1180297

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, J. C. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. F. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 238241). Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. https://www.nctm.org/PtA/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 372415. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nolen, S. B., Horn, I. S., & Ward, C. J. (2015). Situating motivation. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 234247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075399

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palatnik, A., & Koichu, B. (2017). Sense making in the context of algebraic activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(3), 245262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9744-1

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parks, A. N. (2015). Exploring mathematics through play in the early childhood classroom. Teachers College Press.

  • Pea, R., & Martin, L. (2010). Values that occasion and guide mathematics in the family. In W. R. Penuel & K. O’Connor (Eds.), Learning research as a human science (pp. 3452). Teachers College Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Penrose, R. (1974). The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research. Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, 10, 266271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 755). Academic Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334370). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schön, D. A. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 119139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1992.11076093

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 11781197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silver, E. A., & Metzger, W. (1989). Aesthetic influences on expert mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 5974). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6_5

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair, N. (2001). The aesthetic is relevant. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(1), 2532. https://flm-journal.org/Articles/4ED622D33D2B170F009E53357BCE28.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair, N. (2004). The roles of the aesthetic in mathematical inquiry. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(3), 261284. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0603_1

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair, N. (2006). Mathematics and beauty: Aesthetic approaches to teaching children. Teachers College Press.

  • Sinclair, N. (2018). An aesthetic turn in mathematics education. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 5166). PME.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2014). Spatial reasoning for young learners. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 173203). PME.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair, N., Pimm, D., & Higginson, W. (2006). Mathematics and the aesthetic: New approaches to an ancient affinity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38145-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinclair, N., & Watson, A. (2001). Wonder, the rainbow and the aesthetics of rare experiences. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(3), 3942. https://flm-journal.org/Articles/2170DB97F55DF87CDA4C761DF84480.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9478-2

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van der Veen, J. (2012). Draw your physics homework? Art as a path to understanding in physics teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 356407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211435521

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 2. The fundamentals of defectology. Springer Science & Business Media.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vygotsky, L. (1997). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 2936). W. H. Freeman and Company. (Original work published 1978)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weida, C. L., & Bradbury, C. (2020). Magical aesthetics of unicorns in girlhood visual culture. Visual Culture & Gender, 15, 4455. https://vcg.emitto.net/index.php/vcg/article/view/146

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wells, D. (1990). Are these the most beautiful? The Mathematical Intelligencer, 12(3), 3741. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024015

  • Wilders, R., & VanOyen, L. (2011). Turning students into symmetry detectives. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17(2), 103107. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.17.2.0103

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2287 583 15
Full Text Views 699 75 3
PDF Downloads 904 113 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0