Using Moment-by-Moment Reading Protocols to Understand Students’ Processes of Reading Mathematical Proof
Search for other papers by Paul Christian Dawkins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dov Zazkis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article documents differences between novice and experienced undergraduate students’ processes of reading mathematical proofs as revealed by moment-by-moment, think-aloud protocols. We found three key reading behaviors that describe how novices’ reading differed from that of their experienced peers: alternative task models, accrual of premises, and warranting. Alternative task models refer to the types of goals that students set up for their reading of the text, which may differ from identifying and justifying inferences. Accrual of premises refers to the way novice readers did not distinguish propositions in the theorem statement as assumptions or conclusions and thus did not use them differently for interpreting the proof. Finally, we observed variation in the type and quality of warrants, which we categorized as illustrate with examples, construct a miniproof, or state the warrant in general form.
Contributor Notes
Paul Christian Dawkins, Department of Mathematics, Texas State University, MCS 470, San Marcos, TX 78666; pcd27@txstate.edu
