Working Across Contexts: Scaling Up or Replicating With Variations?

Footnotes

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1941494. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  • 1.

    Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Erlbaum.

  • 2.

    Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M. , Kramer, S. L., Hiebert J., & Bakker, A. (2020a). Addressing the problem of always starting over: Identifying, valuing, and sharing professional knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(2), 130–139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M. , Kramer, S. L., Hiebert J., & Bakker, A. (2020b). Maximizing the quality of learning opportunities for every student. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 1225. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresemtheduc.2019.0005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V. , & Hiebert, J. (2018). Building and structuring knowledge that could actually improve instructional practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 238246. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresemtheduc.49.3.0238

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Century, J., Rudnick, M. , & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010366173

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Cobb, P. , & Smith, T. (2008). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districts as learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 231254). Sense.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher 32(6), 312. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x032006003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Czocher, J. A. , & Weber, K. (2020). Proof as a cluster category. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 5074. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresemtheduc.2019.0007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Gaut, B. (2000). “Art” as a cluster concept. In N. Carroll (Ed.), Theories of art today (pp. 2544). University of Wisconsin Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Gu, F., Huang, R. , & Gu, L. (2017). Theory and development of teaching through variation in mathematics in China. In R. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics through variation: Confucian heritage meets Western theories (pp. 1341). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007 /978-94-6300-782-5_2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Institute of Education Sciences & National Science Foundation. (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development.

  • 12.

    Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

  • 13.

    Maass, K., Cobb, P., Krainer, K. , & Potari, D. (2019a). Different ways to implement innovative teaching approaches at scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 303318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09920-8

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Maass, K., Cobb, P., Krainer, K. , & Potari, D. (Eds.). (2019b). Different ways to large scale implementation of innovative teaching approaches [Special issue]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Marton, F. , & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193220.

  • 16.

    McDonald, S.-K., Keesler, V. A., Kauffman, N. J. , & Schneider, B. (2006). Scaling-up exemplary interventions. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 1524. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x035003015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Morris, A. K. (2012). Using “lack of fidelity” to improve teaching. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(1), 71101. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.1.0071

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Morris, A. K. , & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10393501

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    National Science Foundation. (2017). Discovery research preK-12 (DRK-12) program solicitation (NSF 17-584). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2017/nsf17584/nsf17584.pdf.

  • 20.

    Robinson, J. P. , & Curtiss, M. (2018). Millions learning Real-time Scaling Labs: Designing an adaptive learning process to support large-scale change in education. Center for Universal Education at Brookings.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Stigler, J. W. , & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 106 106 40
Full Text Views 39 39 4
PDF Downloads 28 28 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0