The Roles of Textual Features, Background Knowledge, and Disciplinary Expertise in Reading a Calculus Textbook

Author:
Emilie Wiesner Ithaca College

Search for other papers by Emilie Wiesner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aaron Weinberg Ithaca College

Search for other papers by Aaron Weinberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ellie Fitts Fulmer Ithaca College

Search for other papers by Ellie Fitts Fulmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
John Barr Ithaca College

Search for other papers by John Barr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Textbooks are a standard component of undergraduate mathematics courses, but research shows that students often do not view textbooks as productive resources to support learning. This article seeks to understand the factors affecting how individuals engage in reading a calculus textbook excerpt and what they learn from reading. To better understand the separate roles of background knowledge and other reading practices, we compare 2 readers: a 2nd-semester calculus student and a nonmathematics STEM professor. We employ the concepts of sense making and the implied reader to analyze each reader’s experience and a disciplinary literacy perspective to explain the similarities and differences we find between the 2 readers. We propose the concept of didactical disciplinary literacy—an adaptation of disciplinary literacy applied to didactical texts—to describe the ways that the professor drew on his identity as a teacher to shape his reading practices.

Contributor Notes

Emilie Wiesner, Department of Mathematics, Ithaca College, 953 Danby Rd., Ithaca, NY 14850; ewiesner@ithaca.edu

Aaron Weinberg, Department of Mathematics, Ithaca College, 953 Danby Rd., Ithaca, NY 14850; aweinberg@ithaca.edu

Ellie Fitts Fulmer, Department of Education, Ithaca College, 953 Danby Rd., Ithaca, NY 14850; efulmer@ithaca.edu

John Barr, Department of Computer Science, Ithaca College, 953 Danby Rd., Ithaca, NY 14850; barr@ithaca.edu

(Corresponding author is Wiesner ewiesner@ithaca.edu)
(Corresponding author is Weinberg aweinberg@ithaca.edu)
(Corresponding author is Fulmer efulmer@ithaca.edu)
(Corresponding author is Barr barr@ithaca.edu)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  • 1.

    Adams, T. L. (2003). Reading mathematics: More than words can say. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 786795.

  • 2.

    Avalos, M. A. , Bengochea, A. , & Secada, W. G. (2015). Reading mathematics: More than words and clauses; more than numbers and symbols on a page. In K. Santi & D. Reed (Eds.), Improving reading comprehension of middle and high school students (pp. 4974). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14735-2_3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Barton, M. L. , Heidema, C. , & Jordan, D. (2002). Teaching reading in mathematics and science. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 2428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Berger, M. (2017). Reading mathematics text: A study of two empirical readings. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 385404. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9867-6

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Chandler-Olcott, K. , Doerr, H. M. , Hinchman, K. A. , & Masingila, J. O. (2015). Bypass, augment, or integrate: How secondary mathematics teachers address the literacy demands of standards-based curriculum materials. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(4), 439472. doi:10.1177/1086296x16632040

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2016). Active learning in post-secondary mathematics education [position paper]. Retrieved from http://www.cbmsweb.org/Statements/Active_Learning_Statement.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Dervin, B. (1983, May). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods and results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/wpratt/MEBI598/Methods/An%20Overview%20of%20Sense-Making%20Research%201983a.htm

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Dervin, B. (1989). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 3646. doi:10.1108/13673279810249369

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Eddy, S. L. , & Hogan K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453468. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Fan, L. , Zhu, Y. , & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633646. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Fang, Z. (2014). Preparing content area teachers for disciplinary literacy instruction: The role of literacy teacher educators. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 444448. doi:10.1002/jaal.269

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Fang, Z. & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587597. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.7.6

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Freeman, S. , Eddy, S. L. , McDonough, M. , Smith, M. K. , Okoroafor, N. , Jordt, H. , & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 84108415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Gee, J. (1991). Socio-cultural approaches to literacy (literacies). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 3148. doi:10.1017/S0267190500002130

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Hancock, D. R. & Algozzine, B. (2017). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Hughes-Hallett, D. , McCallum, W. , Gleason, A. , Connally, E. , Lovelock, D. , Patterson, C. L , … Tucker, T. (2013). Calculus (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Inglis, M. , & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358390. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

  • 19.

    Jones, S. R. (2015a). Areas, anti-derivatives, and adding up pieces: Definite integrals in pure mathematics and applied science contexts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 928. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Jones, S. R. (2015b). The prevalence of area-under-a-curve and anti-derivative conceptions over Riemann sum-based conceptions in students’ explanations of definite integrals. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(5), 721736. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2014.1001454

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Lee, C. D. , & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy (Final report from Carnegie Corporation of New York’s Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy). Retrieved from https://www.carnegie.org/media/filer_public/88/05/880559fd-afb1-49ad-af0e-e10c8a94d366/ccny_report_2010_tta_lee.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 5275. doi:10.2307/749098

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Love, E. , & Pimm, D. (1996) “This is so”: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop , K. Clements , C. Keitel , J. Kilpatrick , & C. Laborde (Eds.), Kluwer International Handbooks of Education: Vol. 4. International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_12

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Maxson, K. , & Szaniszlo, Z. (Eds.). (2015). Special issue on the flipped classroom: Effectiveness as an instructional model [Special issue]. PRIMUS, 25(9–10), 765767.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Moje, E. B. (2008). Responsive literacy teaching in secondary school content areas. In M. W. Conley , J. R. Freidhoff , M. B. Sherry , & S. F. Tuckey (Eds.), Meeting the challenge of adolescent literacy: Research we have, research we need (pp. 5897). New York, NY: Guilford.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Moje, E. B. , Stockdill, D. , Kim, K. , & Kim, H. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In M. L. Kamil , P. D. Pearson , E. B. Moje , & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453486). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203840412

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: Author.

  • 28.

    Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 325346. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-9016-y

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Randahl, M. (2012). First-year engineering students’ use of their mathematics textbook—Opportunities and constraints. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(3), 239256. doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0040-9

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938). Literature as exploration. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.

  • 31.

    Shanahan, C. , Shanahan, T. , & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393429. doi:10.1177/1086296X11424071

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Shanahan, T. , & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 718. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Shepherd, M. D. , Selden, A. , & Selden, J. (2012). University students’ reading of their first-year mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226256. doi:10.1080/10986065.2012.682959

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Shepherd, M. D. , & van de Sande, C. C. (2014). Reading mathematics for understanding—From novice to expert. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 7486. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.06.003

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Spirek, M. M. , Dervin, B. , Nilan, M. , & Martin, M. (1999). Bridging gaps between audience and media: A sense-making comparison of reader information needs in life-facing versus newspaper reading contexts [Special issue]. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 9(2–4).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London, England: Longman.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258288. doi:10.1080/10986060903253954

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Thompson, D. R. , Kersaint, G. , Richards, J. C. , Hunsader, P. D. , & Rubenstein, R. N. (2008). Mathematical literacy: Helping students make meaning in the middle grades. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Thompson, P. , & Silverman, J. (2008). The concept of accumulation in calculus. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 4352). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. doi:10.5948/UPO9780883859759.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Weber, K. , & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2011). Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 329344. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9292-z

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Weinberg, A. (2010). The implied reader in calculus textbooks. In P. Brosnan , D. B. Erchick , & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 105113). Columbus: The Ohio State University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Weinberg, A. , & Thomas, M. (2018). Student learning and sense-making from video lectures. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 922943. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2018.1426794

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Weinberg, A. , & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 4963. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9264-3

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Weinberg, A. , Wiesner, E. , & Barr, J. (2016). Sense-making practices of expert and novice readers. In M. B. Wood , E. E. Turner , M. Civil , & J. A. Eli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 97104). Tucson: The University of Arizona.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Weinberg, A. , Wiesner, E. , Benesh, B. , & Boester, T. (2012). Undergraduate students’ self-reported use of mathematics textbooks. PRIMUS, 22(2), 152175. doi:10.1080/10511970.2010.509336

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Weinberg, A. , Wiesner, E. , & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2014). Students’ sense-making frames in mathematics lectures. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 168179. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Wilson, W. D. (1981). Readers in texts. PMLA, 96(5), 848863. doi:10.2307/462128

  • 48.

    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3320 1833 201
Full Text Views 458 43 3
PDF Downloads 535 82 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0