Maximizing the Quality of Learning Opportunities for Every Student

Footnotes

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1941494. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  • 1.

    Alcock L Hernandez-Martinez P Godwin Patel A & Sirl D (2020). Study habits and attainment in undergraduate mathematics: A social network analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 2649.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Barwell R Moschkovich JN & Setati Phakeng M (2017). Language diversity and mathematics: Second language, bilingual, and multilingual learners. In Cai J (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 583606). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Berliner DC (1979). Tempus educare. In Peterson PL & Walberg HJ (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 120135). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Boaler J (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 4162. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749717

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Boaler J & Selling SK (2017). Psychological imprisonment or intellectual freedom? A longitudinal study of contrasting school mathematics approaches and their impact on adults’ lives. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 78105.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Cai J Morris A Hohensee C Hwang S Robison V & Hiebert J (2017a). Clarifying the impact of educational research on students’ learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(2), 118123. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.2.0118

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Cai J Morris A Hohensee C Hwang S Robison V & Hiebert J (2017b). A future vision of mathematics education research: Blurring the boundaries of research and practice to address teachers’ problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 466473. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.5.0466

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cai J Morris A Hohensee C Hwang S Robison V & Hiebert J (2017c). Making classroom implementation an integral part of research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 342347. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0342

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Cai J Morris A Hohensee C Hwang S Robison V & Hiebert J (2018). Building and structuring knowledge that could actually improve instructional practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 238246. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.3.0238

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Clarke DJ (1997). Studying the classroom negotiation of meaning: Complementary accounts methodology. Qualitative research methods in mathematics education . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Number 9, 98111. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749949

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Clarke D Keitel C & Shimizu Y (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Cohen DK Raudenbush SW & Ball DL (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119142. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    College voor Toetsen en Examens. (2019). Examenblad wiskunde 2019 [Exam program mathematics 2019]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Author. Retrieved from https://www.examenblad.nl/vak/wiskunde/2019/vwo

    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Darling-Hammond L (2007). The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 318334. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07308253

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Department for Education. (2014). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study . Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-study

    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Diversity in Mathematics Education Center for Learning and Teaching. (2007). Culture, race, power, and mathematics education. In Lester FK Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 405433). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Doyle W (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students’ thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 167180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Floden RE (2002). The measurement of opportunity to learn. In Porter AC & Gamoran A (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 231266). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/10322

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Gutiérrez R (1996). Practices, beliefs, and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 495529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280501

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Gutiérrez R (2000). Advancing African-American, urban youth in mathematics: Unpacking the success of one mathematics department. American Journal of Education, 109(1), 63111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/444259

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Halai A & Clarkson P (Eds.). (2016). Teaching and learning mathematics in multilingual classrooms: Issues for policy , practice and teacher education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Brill/Sense.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Hanna G (Ed.). (2002). Towards gender equity in mathematics education: An ICMI study. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

  • 23.

    Hedges LV & Nowell A (1999). Changes in the Black-White gap in achievement test scores. Sociology of Education, 72(2), 111135. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2673179

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Henningsen M & Stein MK (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524549. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749690

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Hiebert J (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 319. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749627

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Hiebert J Gallimore R Garnier H Givvin KB Hollingsworth H Jacobs JStigler J (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Hiebert J Stigler JW Jacobs JK Givvin KB Garnier H Smith MGallimore R (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002111

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Husén T (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vol. I). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Inglis M & Foster C (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462500. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Jackson K (2011). Approaching participation in school-based mathematics as a cross-setting phenomenon. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 111150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.528319

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Jackson K Garrison A Wilson J Gibbons L & Shahan E (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646682. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Jackson K & Wilson J (2012). Supporting African American students’ learning of mathematics: A problem of practice. Urban Education, 47(2), 354398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911429083

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Kullberg A Kempe UR & Marton F (2017). What is made possible to learn when using the variation theory of learning in teaching mathematics? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 559569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0858-4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Lampert M (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

  • 35.

    Leder GC (2019). Gender and mathematics education: An overview. In Kaiser G & Presmeg N (Eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 289308). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_13

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Lubienski ST & Ganley CM (2017). Research on gender and mathematics. In Cai J (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 649666). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Mammarella IC Caviola S & Dowker A (Eds.). (2019). Mathematics anxiety: What is known and what is still to be understood. New York, NY: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Martin DB (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604866

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Martin DB Rousseau Anderson C & Shah N (2017). Race and mathematics education. In Cai J (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 607636). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Marton F (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • 41.

    Middleton J Jansen A & Goldin GA (2017). The complexities of mathematical engagement: Motivation, affect, and social interactions. In Cai J (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 667699). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Ministry of Education of China. (2011). Mathematics curriculum standard of compulsory education (2011 version). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_711/201201/xxgk_129268.html (in Chinese)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

  • 44.

    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.

  • 45.

    National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • 47.

    Nemirovsky R Kelton ML & Civil M (2017). Toward a vibrant and socially significant informal mathematics education. In Cai J (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 968979). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Nuthall G (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273306. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.74.3.e08k1276713824u5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Otten S Webel C & de Araujo Z (2017). Inspecting the foundations of claims about cognitive demand and student learning: A citation analysis of Stein and Lane (1996). The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 111120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Sonnert G Barnett M & Sadler P (2020). The effects of mathematics preparation and mathematics attitudes on college calculus performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 105125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Stein MK & Lane S (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 5080. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361960020103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Stein M Smith MS Henningsen MA & Silver EA (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Sullivan P Knott L & Yang Y (2015). The relationship between task design, anticipated pedagogies, and student learning. In Watson A & Ohtani M (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22 (pp. 83114). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Tate WF IV (2008). The political economy of teacher quality in school mathematics: African American males, opportunity structures, politics, and method. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(7), 953971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207311999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M (2005). Can scientific research answer the ‘what’ question of mathematics education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 3553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000332489

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Walkowiak TA Pinter HH & Berry RQ (2017). A reconceptualized framework for “opportunity to learn” in school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 8(1), 718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 466 466 60
Full Text Views 212 212 10
PDF Downloads 128 128 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0