Equity Within Mathematics Education Research as a Political Act: Moving From Choice to Intentional Collective Professional Responsibility

Author:
Julia Aguirre University of Washington Tacoma

Search for other papers by Julia Aguirre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Beth Herbel-Eisenmann Michigan State University

Search for other papers by Beth Herbel-Eisenmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sylvia Celedón-Pattichis University of New Mexico

Search for other papers by Sylvia Celedón-Pattichis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marta Civil University of Arizona

Search for other papers by Marta Civil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Trena Wilkerson Baylor University

Search for other papers by Trena Wilkerson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michelle Stephan University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Search for other papers by Michelle Stephan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephen Pape Johns Hopkins University

Search for other papers by Stephen Pape in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Douglas H. Clements University of Denver

Search for other papers by Douglas H. Clements in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

In 2005, the NCTM Research Committee devoted its commentary to exploring how mathematics education research might contribute to a better understanding of equity in school mathematics education (Gutstein et al., 2005). In that commentary, the concept of equity included both conditions and outcomes of learning. Although multiple definitions of equity exist, the authors of that commentary expressed it this way: “The main issue for us is how mathematics education research can contribute to understanding the causes and effects of inequity, as well as the strategies that effectively reduce undesirable inequities of experience and achievement in mathematics education” (p. 94). That research commentary brought to the foreground important questions one might ask about equity in school mathematics and some of the complexities associated with doing that work. It also addressed how mathematics education researchers (MERs) could bring a “critical equity lens” (p. 95, hereafter referred to as an “equity lens”) to the research they do. Fast forward 10 years to now: Where is the mathematics education researcher (MER) community in terms of including an equity lens in mathematics education research? Gutiérrez (2010/2013) argued that a sociopolitical turn in mathematics education enables us to ask and answer harder, more complex questions that include issues of identity, agency, power, and sociocultural and political contexts of mathematics, learning, and teaching. A sociopolitical approach allows us to see the historical legacy of mathematics as a tool of oppression as well as a product of our humanity.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 226 KB)
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2221 390 39
Full Text Views 345 73 4
PDF Downloads 465 99 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0